@article{Hindley1983235,
    Abstract = {This note gives a simple counterexample to back up Pottinger's explanation of the difference between propositional logic, and the type theories of Pottinger (1980) and Coppo- Dezani (1978). The example depends on a theorem of Ben-Yelles (1979).},
    Author = {Hindley, J.Roger},
    File = {Coppo-Dezani types do not correspond to propositional logic - Hindley (0) (0) - a - a - r.pdf},
    ISSN = {0304-3975},
    Journal = {Theoretical Computer Science},
    Number = {1--2},
    Pages = {235 - 236},
    Title = {Coppo-Dezani types do not correspond to propositional logic},
    URL = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304397583900749},
    Volume = {28},
    Year = {1983},
    bdsk-url-1 = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304397583900749},
    bdsk-url-2 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(83)90074-9},
    date-added = {2014-09-08 08:01:04 +0000},
    date-modified = {2014-09-08 08:01:04 +0000},
    doi = {10.1016/0304-3975(83)90074-9}
}

@article{Hindley1983235, Abstract = {This note gives a simple counterexample to back up Pottinger's explanation of the difference between propositional logic, and the type theories of Pottinger (1980) and Coppo- Dezani (1978). The example depends on a theorem of Ben-Yelles (1979).}, Author = {Hindley, J.Roger}, File = {Coppo-Dezani types do not correspond to propositional logic - Hindley (0) (0) - a - a - r.pdf}, ISSN = {0304-3975}, Journal = {Theoretical Computer Science}, Number = {1--2}, Pages = {235 - 236}, Title = {Coppo-Dezani types do not correspond to propositional logic}, URL = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304397583900749}, Volume = {28}, Year = {1983}, bdsk-url-1 = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304397583900749}, bdsk-url-2 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(83)90074-9}, date-added = {2014-09-08 08:01:04 +0000}, date-modified = {2014-09-08 08:01:04 +0000}, doi = {10.1016/0304-3975(83)90074-9} }